Assessments for Clinical Competence

Assessments for clinical competence have long been a cornerstone of medical education. Among them, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), also known as Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE), Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA), Simulated Lab Assessment (SLA), or Performance-Based Assessment (PBA), offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating a medical student's capabilities. The integration of educational technology (EdTech) with OSCEs is ushering in a transformative era for this traditional examination method. To truly appreciate how EdTech is supporting assessments for clinical competence, we need to delve deeper into the significance, nuances, and evolution of the OSCE.

The Origin of OSCEs

Historically, the assessment of medical professionals rested heavily on written examinations and oral evaluations. While these methods were effective in gauging theoretical knowledge and recall capabilities, they fell short in assessing hands-on clinical skills, communication, and interpersonal interactions – all vital components of patient care. There was a growing realization in the medical community that a significant gap existed between what was being assessed and the actual competencies required in real-world clinical settings.

The OSCE was developed as a transformative approach to clinical assessments. The term "Objective Structured Clinical Examination" was coined in the 1970s by Dr. Ronald Harden and his colleagues at the University of Dundee, Scotland. Recognizing the limitations of traditional assessment methods, they sought to develop an examination format that would be more comprehensive and reflective of a clinician’s day-to-day tasks. The primary objectives behind the inception of OSCEs were:

  1. Objective Assessment: Traditional assessments, especially oral evaluations, were often influenced by examiner biases. OSCEs, with their structured format and standardized criteria, aimed to minimize such biases and ensure a more objective evaluation.

  2. Practical Skills Evaluation: OSCEs brought to the forefront the importance of hands-on clinical skills. Through simulated patient interactions, candidates could be assessed on their ability to diagnose, communicate, and perform procedures – skills that are central to effective patient care.

  3. Standardization: With the use of standardized patients (SPs) and structured marking schemes, OSCEs aimed to provide a consistent evaluation experience for all candidates, regardless of the examiner or the location of the examination.

  4. Feedback & Improvement: Unlike traditional exams where feedback was often limited, OSCEs offered detailed insights into a candidate's performance. This feedback mechanism was crucial for continuous learning and improvement.

The shift to OSCEs was driven by the need for a more holistic and relevant assessment method. The medical community recognized that producing competent clinicians required an evaluation system that went beyond textbook knowledge. OSCEs, with their emphasis on real-world clinical skills and competencies, were the answer to this pressing need. Over the decades, they have been adopted and adapted by medical institutions worldwide, becoming the foundation of the assessment of clinical competence.

The Significance of OSCEs

  1. Comprehensive Evaluation: Unlike traditional written exams that focus primarily on theoretical knowledge, OSCEs provide a well-rounded assessment. They evaluate not just a candidate's knowledge but also their ability to apply this knowledge in practical scenarios. This includes diagnosis skills, communication, empathy, and procedural expertise, all of which are pivotal in ensuring holistic patient care.

  2. Standardized Assessment: Standardization is at the heart of OSCEs. Using trained standardized patients (SPs) and structured evaluation criteria, OSCEs offer a consistent, objective measure of student performance. This ensures that every candidate, irrespective of the examiner or examination center, is judged based on the same set of criteria, reducing potential biases and impartiality.

  3. Relevance to Clinical Practice: OSCE scenarios are carefully designed to mirror common clinical situations that medical professionals encounter regularly. This real-world relevance ensures that students are not just prepared for theoretical challenges but are also equipped to tackle practical medical dilemmas, improving patient outcomes, safety, and ethical considerations.

Challenges and Limitations

  1. Logistical Considerations: Implementing OSCEs is a complex process. Organizing the necessary resources, from trained SPs to specialized spaces and equipment, can be logistically demanding. Coordinating these elements, especially in large-scale assessments with numerous candidates, can pose significant challenges.

  2. Variability in Assessment: Even with rigorous standardization, certain variables can introduce inconsistencies. For instance, SPs, despite training, might interact differently with candidates, or there might be subtle variations in how examiners interpret and apply the evaluation criteria. These variables can affect the overall reliability of the assessment.

  3. Economic Constraints: Conducting high-quality OSCEs, especially those that involve intricate scenarios, advanced equipment, or a large number of SPs, can be financially demanding. Balancing the need for comprehensive evaluation with budgetary constraints can pose challenges for institutions, potentially affecting the quality or frequency of assessments.

EdTech's Role in Enhancing OSCEs

The use of educational technology to support OSCEs is not merely a trend; it represents a significant advancement in how these exams are conducted, evaluated, and improved upon. These benefits include:

  1. Digital Scoring Platforms: Traditional OSCEs often relied on manual scoring, which, despite best efforts, could be prone to human error. Digital platforms facilitate real-time scoring, ensuring accuracy, and consistency. These platforms can also automatically compile and analyze scores, offering insights into patterns of performance. For educators and administrators, this means a quicker turnaround in evaluations, and for students, immediate feedback on their strengths and areas of improvement.

  2. Simulation Tools: Simulators and Virtual Reality (VR) platforms offer a safe environment for candidates to practice. Advanced simulations can recreate intricate clinical environments, from a routine diagnostic scenario to more complex surgical procedures. This allows candidates to practice without the risks associated with real-world clinical settings. VR, in particular, offers immersive experiences, helping candidates to hone their skills in near-real conditions, enhancing their preparedness for actual OSCEs (and importantly, real clinical scenarios involving potential risk).

  3. Data-Driven Decisions: One significant feature of modern EdTech platforms is their ability to gather and analyze vast amounts of data. For OSCEs, this means in-depth analysis of student performance trends, strengths, and areas needing improvement. Institutions can use this data to refine their curriculum, focus on specific training areas, and even tailor (and improve upon future) OSCE scenarios based on real-world clinical challenges.

  4. Remote Assessments: Recent global events have stressed the importance of flexibility in education. Digital platforms have made it possible to conduct OSCEs remotely. Video conferencing tools, integrated with digital scoring systems, enable evaluations to occur irrespective of geographical constraints. This not only ensures continuity in assessments but also lays the groundwork for opportunities in cross-institutional or even international OSCE collaborations.

  5. Digital Training Modules: Preparation is key for both candidates and SPs. Online modules, equipped with dynamic multimedia content, interactive quizzes, and real-world scenarios, ensure that the training is standardized and accessible. For candidates, it means better preparation; for SPs, it ensures they are consistent in their portrayal of medical conditions, enhancing the reliability of the OSCE. By seamlessly integrating these edtech advancements into the traditional OSCE framework, institutions can offer a more comprehensive, objective, and relevant clinical assessment experience. The result is better-prepared medical professionals equipped to handle the multifaceted challenges of modern healthcare.

The Future of OSCEs

A closer examination of recent general technological advancements reveals how EdTech might revolutionize clinical competence evaluations.

  1. Adaptive AI Scenarios: As AI becomes more sophisticated, it can be harnessed to introduce responsive OSCE scenarios. Unlike static situations, these AI-driven scenarios would adapt based on student decisions, simulating the unpredictability of real-world clinical situations. This dynamic adjustment can challenge students in unique ways, ensuring they're prepared for a variety of clinical outcomes.

  2. Augmented Reality: Augmented Reality (AR) has the potential to revolutionize OSCEs by providing contextual overlays during exams. Imagine a student performing a physical examination while AR provides real-time data, such as vital statistics or underlying conditions. This integration would not only aid in the examination process but also prepare students for a future where AR could be a standard tool in diagnostics and treatment.

  3. Blockchain Security: With the increasing emphasis on data security and authenticity, blockchain technology could play a pivotal role in OSCEs. Ensuring the authenticity of OSCE results, blockchain could offer tamper-proof, verifiable records. This secure recording system could be crucial for licensing and accrediting bodies, ensuring that results are genuine and unaltered. Self-sovereign digital records and verifiable credentials give learners complete control over their results, allowing them to share records at their discretion and with their chosen recipients.

  4. Personalized Feedback Systems: As machine learning and data analytics advance, there's potential for feedback systems that are tailored to individual students. Instead of generic feedback, advanced algorithms could analyze a student's performance to offer specific insights, recommendations, and resources. This personalized approach can streamline a student's learning journey, addressing their unique challenges and strengths.

  5. Collaborative Platforms and Interoperability: The future of medical education is likely to be more collaborative. EdTech can facilitate platforms where multidisciplinary teams from across the globe collaborate on OSCE scenarios. This approach can reflect the collaborative nature and multidisciplinary approach of modern healthcare, where teams often comprise various specialists. Such platforms could also be a ground for shared learning, global standards, simple data transfer, and cross-cultural medical insights.

By exploring and being aware of these future directions, institutions can stay ahead of the curve, ensuring that their OSCEs are not only relevant for today but also poised to meet the evolving challenges and opportunities of tomorrow's healthcare landscape.


The OSCE remains a cornerstone of the assessment process in medical education. As the demands and complexities of the medical field increase, there's a pressing need for innovative assessment methodologies. EdTech is emerging as a pivotal force to support this evolution, offering tools and platforms that not only address the current challenges of OSCEs but also enhance and transform the assessment experience.

Recent technological advancements pave the way for transformative possibilities, from AI-driven scenarios to enhanced diagnostic experiences using AR. Furthermore, with the increasing importance of data security and the potential for more personalized feedback, there's an evident shift towards a more interconnected and holistic approach to medical education. The integration of global collaboration platforms further signals a move towards a unified, efficient, and expansive educational ecosystem.

For institutions, educators, and administrators embracing these technological advancements is not just about staying updated. It's about leading and defining the future of clinical competence assessments. By integrating EdTech solutions into the fabric of OSCEs, the next generation of medical professionals will be ready and equipped to tackle the multifaceted challenges of modern healthcare.

Kyle Erickson, M.Ed., D.C.

Kyle Erickson, M.Ed., D.C.

Kyle is a seasoned product expert at Shift iQ. With a rich background spanning education, healthcare, and technology, Kyle utilizes his unique blend of experience to deliver powerful and innovative learning solutions. Prior to joining Shift iQ, he served as a teacher, college instructor, and curriculum developer (SME). For several years, he was also in clinical practice as a chiropractor, adding a unique dimension to his career and skill set. Kyle holds a Master of Education degree specializing in Educational Technology, Master's certificates in E-Learning and Instructional Design, a Doctor of Chiropractic degree, and a Bachelor of Education degree. His multifaceted expertise and passion for learning and product development make him a driving force in EdTech.

Share post:

Get a free, no-strings attached demo for your assessment and training needs.
2023 Top Assessment Platform Award
2023 Watchlist Wordpress Assessment Evaluation
We are pleased to announce Shift iQ is listed as one of the top assessment and evaluation providers for 2023!